← vanagon.com home · Continue the discussion in the forum
VanagonEuroVan
Sort by authorSort by posting dateSort by topicChronological orderMost recent firstShow authorHide authorShow table of contentsHide table of contentsBack to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGONSearch
Subject:Re: Nominations are now open: Top 10 Ugliest Parts to Fail
From:Bruce Todd <beeceetee@GMAIL.COM>
Date:Tue, 1 Sep 2009 21:27:27 -0700

On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Rocket J Squirrel <
camping.elliott@gmail.com> wrote:

> Well, that Friday thread generated only 9 posts, most of which were a
> debate about the availability of the plastic coolant tower thing, and two
> nominations by Jim Arnott for the the 1.9 "H" pipe and the 1.9 upper
> thermostat housing. That post garnered no comments.
>
> So . . . would it be fair to say that the 1.9 "H" pipe and upper thermo
> housing are the only parts on the Vanagon which are effectively unobtanium
> and without them the van would be effectively immobilized?
>
> Well maybe this might spawn some discussion:  What about the 2.9 metre long
> / 9' brakeline which runs from front to rear - getting one of those made up
> and bent into shape is not a typical saturday walk in the park - heaven
> forbid finding a good used one and or installing it!  Without brakes you
> can't really operate a vehicle - unless your on a farm.
>

BT

← Previous in threadNext in thread →
Back to September 2009, week 1
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »